Tax Evasion in Latin America: An Urgent Call for Attention.

The primary objective of this review is to highlight the importance and gravity of the existing tax evasion in Latin America today.

A study conducted by Santiago Diaz de Sarralde Miguez[1] reports that Latin America and the Caribbean are characterized by a relatively low tax burden, which averages 22.8% of GDP. That is 11.5% less than the OECD -2015-. While it is true that there are large differences between countries, as the tax burden varies from 12.4% in Guatemala to 38.6% in Cuba.

The region has a greater reliance on indirect taxation (almost 50% of the total) and taxation on corporate income than OECD countries. The study highlights also the smaller share of personal income tax (8.8% of the total versus 24% in OECD) and social security contributions (16.4% versus 26.2% in OECD)

The region has a highly unequal income distribution and especially poor redistributive capacity of tax policy. In this regard, the OECD –Gini index of 0.47- is reduced by 36% through the tax policy. However, in LAC, inequality is only reduced by 6% through the tax policy, from a Gini coefficient of 0.5.

Another important feature is the high informality, calculated at 41% compared to 17% in OECD.

The work highlights the high evasion, especially in the income tax of legal entities. There is a high impact of the erosion of tax bases and shifting of benefits to avoid taxation.

Meanwhile, high tax expenditures are underscored (which represent on average 30% of the potential collection)

In another study by Gomez Sabaini and Moran for ECLAC in 2016,[2] it was concluded that tax evasion has been and continues to be one of the main obstacles affecting public finances of countries in the region.

Attention was called by saying that there is no institutionalized task of estimating the evasion, with adequate periodicity and publication of the results, in most countries.

This was demonstrated because of the scarce and insufficient information available as to the magnitude of the problem.

Latinobarometer 2016, an organization that measures various aspects of Latin American reality, emphasizes that the belief that tax evasion is justifiable has recorded steady increases since 2011.

In other words, Latin Americans are now more open to tax evasion than 5 years ago. This reflects an oscillating behavior, suggesting that they are sensitive to conditions being experienced by countries or measures taken by governments.

Meanwhile, in the report entitled taxation for an inclusive growth 2016, prepared by ECLAC and OXFAM, concludes that Latin America and the Caribbean show extreme inequality, the proof of this is that in 2014 the richest 10% had amassed 71% of the regional wealth.

This situation is confirmed by the analysis of tax data available regarding the personal income in the countries of the region.

The study says there are inadequate tax systems totally regressive and high tax evasion and avoidance, costing thousands of dollars that could be invested to combat poverty and inequality.

In that document, it is estimated that revenue losses range from 27% to 65% in income tax. The publication suggests various measures to achieve a taxation with inclusive growth, including tax reforms, improving the capacity of tax administrations and efforts to improve information exchange agreements, among other measures.

In the work entitled “Consensus and Conflict in tax policy in Latin America in 2017”[3] it was stated that in the last two decades most Latin American countries have increased their tax revenues. A high level of noncompliance is nevertheless observed in most of the taxes in force.

It was said that although there is greater social awareness of the seriousness of the problem, the scarcity and dispersion of specific studies on the subject is surprising, which makes difficult to establish accurate diagnoses on the extent of tax noncompliance. It concludes that Latin America remains the most unequal region in the world with a Gini index of 0.52.

OXFAM, for its part in the 2018 report says that between 2002 and 2015 the fortunes of billionaires in Latin America grew by an average of 21% annually. This growth was 6 times higher than the GDP growth experienced in the region.

The output of illicit financial flows and capital flight, product of tax evasion, tax avoidance and tax privileges of multinational corporations to pay fewer taxes, are the main challenges facing the region.

Meanwhile ECLAC in 2018[4] again stresses the high tax evasion, both domestically and internationally, and the existence of substantial tax expenditures.

It says the personal income tax remains the Achilles heel as it only collects 1.8% of GDP compared with 8.4% in OECD countries for the year 2015.

The following measures are said to be key to reducing inequities and achieving inclusive growth in the countries of the region:

  • Broaden tax bases.
  • Improve the design of the tax system.
  • Strengthen the tax administrations.
  • Eliminate the tax evasion routes

In this report it was estimated that tax evasion for 2015 amounted to 2.4% of GDP in VAT and 4.3% of the regional GDP in income tax, which together represented 340 billion dollars and 6.7% of GDP.

Regarding the evasion from international operations, the report notes that very little is known.

In this regard, ECLAC sought to estimate illicit financial outflows by manipulations of prices in international trade, which would be around 0.5% of GDP or about 31 billion dollars annually, which is equivalent to between 10% and 15% of the revenue from corporate income tax.

Recently in 2019, ECLAC[5] says that tax evasion for 2017 amounted to 6.3% of GDP equivalent to 335 billion dollars. In VAT, it stands at 2.3% of GDP and for the income tax at 4.00% of GDP.

Unfortunately, this information has not seen much variation when compared with the estimate for 2016, in which the total evasion was 6.7% of GDP. Meanwhile, the illicit flows of resulting from international manipulation of trade in goods reached US $ 85 billion in 2016, i.e. 1.5% of the regional GDP.

Increasing public revenues is key to strengthening the ability of the tax policy action and support in mobilizing resources to finance the 2030 schedule.

ECLAC reiterates the importance of reducing the high level of tax evasion and illicit financial flows to increase the tax space in the region.

Regarding the reduction of inequality through transfers from direct taxes the report notes that Latin America only achieved 4.7% compared to 38% of the OECD, meaning that OECD countries reduce their inequality by 8 times more than LAC, through their tax policy.

This is not a minor data and it conclusively means that tax policy is failing to reduce inequalities, or worse – in many cases, it is contributing to their increase.

The recent ECLAC report proposes five instruments to expand fiscal space and enhance the agenda 2030:

  • Reduce tax evasion and illicit financial flows.
  • Promote the adoption of taxes to the digital economy.
  • Create environmental taxes to move towards the de-carbonization of the economy and the productive reconversion.
  • Review the tax expenditures.
  • Strengthen the personal income tax and taxes on real estate.

In conclusion, this article has highlighted the importance of the phenomenon of evasion for the region, which is why all countries should urgently analyze internally the magnitude of the phenomenon, its causes and design state policies to fight it.

 

 

[1]          CIAT – Diagnosis Latin America and the Caribbean 2017.
[2]          Tax evasion in Latin America. Juan Carlos Gomez Sabaini and Dalmiro Moran. ECLAC. 2016.
[3]          ECLAC – Juan Carlos Gomez Sabaini, Juan Pablo Jimenez and Ricardo Martner. 2017.
[4]          Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2018 – ECLAC.
[5]          Fiscal Panorama of Latin America and the Caribbean 2019 – ECLAC.

3,898 total views, 2 views today

Disclaimer. Readers are informed that the views, thoughts, and opinions expressed in the text belong solely to the author, and not necessarily to the author's employer, organization, committee or other group the author might be associated with, nor to the Executive Secretariat of CIAT. The author is also responsible for the precision and accuracy of data and sources.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

CIAT Subscriptions

Browse through the site without restrictions. Consult and download the contents.

Subscribe to our electronic newsletters:

  • Blog
  • Academic offer (Only in spanish)
  • Newsletter
  • Publications
  • News alert

Activate subscription

CIAT Members

Representatives, Correspondent and Authorized staff (TA)